|
|
|

| Product Reviews from Amazon.com (Rating System 1 to 5) |
| Review | Rating | Last Updated | JD INSECURE 20 I installed this on My win98SE PC@ home and it complained about some MFC42U.Dll file not able to use as a secure device. What I wound up doing was call Tech Support ony to have the tech tell me to Reformat the drive as FAT not Fat32 to remove the JDSECURE 20 software. Not a big loss, being my files are really only drivers and updates for both Mac and PC machines. But, why sell it as a Secure Device? It should be called JumpDrive Insecure. | 1 | 772 days ago | Worst device ever plugged into my PC Worked great on my XP Pro machine, worked on my XP Home machine but I had to reinstall the drivers every time to see the secure partition. Wouldn't work at all on my ME machine. Now, after two months of use, not even my XP Pro machine will recognize it. Tech support so far can't help at all. Other Lexar drives are okay, but this one is terrible. Avoid the secure drive and get something else. | 1 | 772 days ago | Great on XP, Nothing on 2000 Got my drive at home and set it up on an XP Pro box. Worked like a charm...The security program ran in the background and was easy to set up. Took it to work and plugged it into my Win 2000 box and absolutely nothing but problems. The JDSecure 2.0 program would say it couldn't find a jump drive (tried direct and through a hub), when it did find it the only option it would give was to reformat it. Tech support sent me the JDSecure 3.0 beta to try, no help. Sent the drive back, they said they fixed the problem...Got the drive back, plugged it into the 2000 box and same problems. Now that I've wasted several days on something so simple I think I'll stick to FTP. | 1 | 772 days ago | "Small on size; big on security" Pros: Small, sturdy built, fast and password secure with configuration capability. Cons: Only one slight aggravation: If you want to re-configure (Private/Public stored files, etc); it is necessary to back-up everything before doing so. ie: copy to back and then re-copy after re-configuring security feature... Small inconveniece. Bottom line: Well worth the $$$. | 4 | 772 days ago | Not 2.0 That is about the only complaint: It's USB 1.1 and is slower Unless you have a lot of data the speed is not important. What I needed was secure data transfer. I don't have admin privilges on some of the computers but they still let me put the program on.
<br />
<br />If you need security and don't have a lot of data, just doc's, then get the cheaper Lexar 1.1. If you need speed and security then it would be worth the money. | 4 | 772 days ago |
We thought you might be interested in other BEST DEALS that we found for you: |
| *Pricing and product information listed is obtained from the merchants and is subject to change without notice. Shipping costs are estimated based on UPS ground within US, unless specified otherwise. While we try to validate this information,we cannot assure its validity and therefore disclaim any responsibility for its accuracy or completeness. Always check the latest price, availability, shipping, tax, and product information directly on the merchant web site before purchasing. |
|
|